Microsoft Reader Foiled Again
I couldn't believe it when I found out. I read on Usenet a while back that Microsoft Reader activations could be cloned from one Pocket PC to another simply by copying five files. When I switched from my Jornada 565 to my Toshiba e570 as my primary device, I decided to put the theory to the test.
It worked! My Toshiba is now "activated" to the same Passport account as my Jornada without notifying Microsoft. I won't tell you which five files, as that could be construed as a violation of the DMCA, but it can be done.
I think this is fascinating for two reasons. One, the "hardware-keyed" DRM in Reader 2.0 seems to be no big deal, if it can be copied from one machine to another so easily. I have the files in question backed up to my storage card so I can quickly and easily "activate" any new Pocket PCs I get to the same Passport account.
Which brings me to my second point. I don't understand why telling you which files to copy should be a violation of the DMCA. This technique would be useless to pirates. A device can only be activated to one account at a time, so it wouldn't do pirates any good unless they kept a library of sets of files with the books they activate, and reactivate every time they switch books. A pain in the butt, to be sure.
The only thing this really does is allow people to activate as many devices as they want for their own personal use. That's not wrong, is it?
It worked! My Toshiba is now "activated" to the same Passport account as my Jornada without notifying Microsoft. I won't tell you which five files, as that could be construed as a violation of the DMCA, but it can be done.
I think this is fascinating for two reasons. One, the "hardware-keyed" DRM in Reader 2.0 seems to be no big deal, if it can be copied from one machine to another so easily. I have the files in question backed up to my storage card so I can quickly and easily "activate" any new Pocket PCs I get to the same Passport account.
Which brings me to my second point. I don't understand why telling you which files to copy should be a violation of the DMCA. This technique would be useless to pirates. A device can only be activated to one account at a time, so it wouldn't do pirates any good unless they kept a library of sets of files with the books they activate, and reactivate every time they switch books. A pain in the butt, to be sure.
The only thing this really does is allow people to activate as many devices as they want for their own personal use. That's not wrong, is it?
